New York, 14 November 2001
Mr. Chairman,
Distinguished Ministers,
It gives me great pleasure to speak in the Second Annual Ministerial Meeting
of the Land-locked Developing Countries, an august gathering whose participants
constitute an important part and parcel of the Group of 77, of the developing
community. Allow me, at the very outset, to offer my felicitations on your election
to chair this meeting and express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to you,
Mr. Minister, and to Ambassador Kittikhoun, for the kind invitation. I enjoyed
listening to your opening statement; thanks for a very clear, strong message.
I should also like to commend the United Nations Secretary-General as well as
the Secretary-General of the UNCTAD and their colleagues for the very good and
comprehensive report before us. The report shows very clearly how the challenges
facing the landlocked developing countries have become more complex. UNCTADs
long and valuable service to this group of vulnerable economies is known to
all of us. It is a pleasure to have Mr. Carlos Fortin with us here, and more
so, for the comprehensive statement he just made.
The fifth Meeting of the Governmental Experts from Landlocked and Transit Developing
Countries and Representatives of Donor Countries and Financial and Development
Institutions which was held recently in New York, indicated in clear terms,
in its agreed conclusions and recommendations, that despite some positive developments
in transport systems, lack of territorial access to the sea, aggravated by remoteness
and isolation from world markets and high transit costs and risks, continue
to impose serious constrains on the overall socio-economic developments of landlocked
developing countries. They have not been able to take full benefit of the new
trade and investments opportunities offered by the process of liberalization
and globalization. There is little doubt that they need greater assistance to
enable them to integrate effectively and beneficially into the global economy.
Worse still, as we all know, another sad and unfortunate trend has been at work;
that is, the steady decline in the Official Development Assistance (ODA). This
steady decline, along with inadequate private financing in recent years, put
together, have negatively affected transit systems not only in landlocked developing
countries but also in transit countries as most of them are either developing
or least developed countries.
UNCTADs analytical studies fully reflect the gravity of the situation and the difficulties landlocked developing countries face. They underline the importance of transport for the development process in general and for the promotion of national, regional and international trade in particular. These studies also confirm that weak infrastructures and inefficient transit operations result in high transport costs and are major impediments to trade expansion and sustainable development in many landlocked and transit developing countries. According to these studies development of a coherent rural, national and international transport network is essential for stimulating economic activity, opening up productive areas in individual countries and linking them to national, regional and international markets.
These UNCTAD studies also emphasize the need to address non-physical barriers which compromise the competitiveness of landlocked and transit countries, the reduction of high freight tariffs and action to create and strengthen trade and professional transport associations at the national and regional levels. For this purpose, the capacities of governments and regional institutions to undertake reforms, including further simplification, harmonization and standardization of transit procedures and documentation, should be strengthened.
What I just referred to, neither comprehensive nor in detail, do indeed point to the grave situation these countries face, which, no doubt, call for serious efforts and on an urgent basis. But, in addressing what can and should be done, one has to be as realistic and objective as possible. The solution, given all the parameters involved, lies in a well-articulated approach within a an overall balanced framework addressing the wide range of transit problems. Given the inevitable graduality of remedial actions needed to remove the roadblocks, we need to address some immediate needs and basic requirements.
The first and the most important question in this regard relates to the support to be secured from the international community for the needed plans and projects in order to assure their coherence and relevance to broader international efforts. It is rather axiomatic that major improvement in transit facilities and the rehabilitation of transit infrastructure in the landlocked and transit developing countries requires the close cooperation and generous support, financial and otherwise, of the international community at large; the donor community, financial institutions and development agencies.
Mr. Chairman,
Apart from international support, cross border trade is certainly another crucial
element for the development of landlocked and transit developing countries.
It provides a secure and economical route for transit of products and raw materials
originating from landlocked countries as well as revitalizing economic activities
among the low income people residing along the transit routes. It is within
this framework that reference could be made to the concept of Free Transit Zones,
which I suppose everybody agrees, has spill-over effects benefiting all concerned
countries through facilitating intra trade. Again, as colleagues know well,
the very idea of Free Transit Zones has been developed to overcome the rather
familiar problem of proliferation of government controls in landlocked and transit
developing countries that cause difficulties in smooth transit and delivery
of goods. The suggested free zone shall provide facilities in an environment
where government regulations are relaxed. By embarking on this idea it is hoped
that governments will realize that a more open approach will result in more
prosperity and a conducive environment for business activities as well as investment
in physical infrastructure.
Mr. Chairman,
To conclude, let me welcome the decision at the Fifth Meeting on convening in the year 2003 in Kazakhstan a high-level international meeting in order to give emphasis to the development of efficient transit transport system. We look forward to a see a successful meeting with good, substantive - and as you underlined, Mr. Minister, action-oriented - outcome.
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.